Allah is Beautiful, and Hu Loves Beauty!
When the primordial Question, "Am I not your Lord?" reached my perception, I remember, I had said, "Yes! And You are Beautiful! And I love You!" That became the anthem of my soul. Then I was put to sleep. Now I wake up. This is a chronicle of my awakening.
Friday, July 28, 2006
Quiz: answered
According to me, those who said A = Spicy and B = Sweety got it right!
And even though we have a statictically insignificant number of answers, the answers tend to largely affirm the theory.
Thank you all for participating!
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Believe

If you believe in as many as six incredulous things before breakfast, this may be one for you:
This amulet, if embroidered upon black satin, followed by a chanting of the mantra "Nades, Suradis, Maniner," would make a jinn appear.
Be careful before you make a wish, though. This story about those who wish more than what fate ordains (and get it) would curb any amount of enthusiasm you might have for such an activity, unless you are You-Know-Who himself.
P. S. My opinion? I actually believe in most kinds of non-sense, in that they can happen, if only to find life entertaining.
No actually I do believe in most kinds of things. Anything can happen in a theoretical world. With my love for mathematically warped worlds, I cannot say something cannot happen. It can. But will it?
Whether we must do something or not is a question to answer which we have been given a highly well-functioning brain. I don't recommend any silly practice. And I am serious. For a witchy reason.
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
How sense-tive are you?

The five senses do not operate alone. We decide whether our lunch tastes good or bad based on its smell. The more we can put two or more senses together, the more sensitive we are.
Here is a test I have created, the likes of which exist already, to understand how we understand senses.
Question: Which of these two shapes on the right, A or B, is "Sweety" and which is "Spicy"?
Give the first answer that comes to your head.
Post updated; picture previously not visible to some.
Friday, July 21, 2006
The Secret of the World
About the following, my view is that our approach to the World's Secret is of bafflement and sometimes a sad recognition. For some it is a shock so hard they can never take it - the realization that we live in a Matrix within a Benevolent Matrix.
This is the Secret of the World. It is often - in fact invariably - revealed in intense moments of pain. Like the splitting of an embryonic sac, this process of coming out from a protected delusion to the world of reality is the result of intense pain, followed by intense realization. The Secret of the World is not easy to understand.
Yet once known and then realized, it is tremendously liberating... so empowering... and so obviously been there all along...
On to Stargazer's observations.
The search for an identity, apart from one associated with your convictions and principles, is shallow -- relative at best.
The problem with this quest is that it will bring you no...what is the word? Absolution. The human race's history is nothing but deja vu ad nauseum. Times change but we don't. A negative way of looking at progress is that it is nothing more than the discovery or invention of new tools and techniques for committing new follies that fit the ages.
Our aspirations, our ambitions, our ideas, our goals never really change. We just adapt our manifestation of them according to the era. Half a millennium ago, "Colonization" was the word; 500 years later you refer to it as "Globalization". Only the lexicon has changed, the meanings within have not. Barbaric wars between armies facing each other have been replaced by high-tech weapons in which the opponents simply don't see each others faces -- remote controlled destruction. The agrarian-based feudal system has given way to industrial and commercial capitalism. Three decades ago, letting your hair down and wearing trousers was in. Two decades ago, covering up was the order of the day. Now jeans and nice hair-dos are back in style again.
Don't confuse welfare with political correctness. Torture is politically incorrect; creative information extraction techniques are in vogue.
The reason I find the search for an identity shallow is because everything around me is constantly changing. I have no reference point per se that allows me to seek and claim an identity. Take our relations with our arch-enemy (India) for example. For half a century we had clearly drawn battle lines and we knew everything there was to know about "us vs. them." There were no gray areas. Suddenly in a few blinks, loyalties have shifted; priorities are realigned with the advent of the new millennium in the face of a mercurial globo-political system. Yesterday's enemies are today's friends and more ironically, people whom we were actively supporting for decades are suddenly persona non grata, the hunted. Who's to say whether we were right then and wrong now, or wrong then and right now -- or more so -- right then and right now, or wrong then and also wrong now?
How many people do you think sought identities in those circumstances? How many people do you think thought they knew which side of the line they were on? Where do you think they stand today? Or take our-Western neighbor for example: Afghanistan. The very government that our establishment nurtured and put into place over years has been dismantled and is being hunted down and wiped out by the very same establishment, because it is the need of the hour. What a morbid irony! Yesterday's heroes are now today's villains.
This picture that I have painted was over a span of -- what? A few decades? Now let me step back and give you a wider view, over centuries and millennia. Every few hundred years, nations will rise and fall, borders will be redrawn again and again, civilizations will come and go, sworn blood enemies will become indispensable allies, and long-standing comrades will become victims, empires will come into existence and perish. Wars will be fought, peaces will be made. Constitutions and all man-made laws are mere tools of convenience that allow systems to be put into place that serve the needs of the hour. Place no faith or belief in any constitution, except The One by God, because ours will change in the blink of an eye. Concepts like "liberties", "freedom", "rights", "justice", "sovereignty" as defined by any human being or system can be changed (or the word is "twisted" to indicate its vile implications) the moment it goes against the group in power, the establishment. This is our history-immemorial, in a nutshell.
In such circumstances, don't try to be a hero, don't take sides, and don't try to unnecessarily find who you are. Don't try to identify yourself with anything, any cause, any group, any system, that is not within your control to define. Because the day it changes, there's no telling where you will end up and you will end up questioning your own beliefs. You may be all the better for it --or you may suffer for it.
Either way at the end of the day you will be Judged and remembered by your convictions and principles and how you lived your life therein. Everything else is relative.
Stargazer
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
A particle, travelling
This afternoon, I wondered what is the trouble with scientific education?
I realized that the study of science has initiated with visualizers, but it's imparted by verbalizers.
For a long time, I never understood the difference between a particle travelling in a straight line, at accelerating speed, and its rising graph. No one could answer the simple question: why was the graph curving when the particle was travelling straight? The teacher, if I heard correctly, was always saying, "This is a particle travelling in a straight line...."
No, darling, this is the mathematical representation of the slowly-swiftly-slowly rising speed of a particle which is travelling in a straight line and there is a difference between this and what you are saying. If you don't believe me, ask the curve about the straight line!
Having a highly visual-artistic mind, I for one could not separate the two... it was perhaps my exceptional geometry that earned me an A in the GCSE Maths, but I got a D in Advance Maths, because my mind always got entangled in the graph.
I know now that it's not a handicap but a talent to visualize. Mathematics is a reductionist branch of knowledge that simplifies the complexity of world. Mathematics is best enjoyed visually, not be verbalizing the formulae. We need, at least in this century, schools that stop preaching and make room for visualization and experimentation.
We need more experiential schools!
